To:
Alexander Mayrhofer <axelm@nic.at>
CC:
ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From:
janusz <janusz@ca.afilias.info>
Date:
Thu, 13 Apr 2006 10:34:41 -0400
In-Reply-To:
<443E51AE.3070805@nic.at>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
User-Agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040413 Debian/1.6-5
Subject:
Re: [ietf-provreg] RFC3731: domain:roid in <info> response
Alex, making the element OPTIONAL could create some problems for EPP clients. A domain object with the same name can be deleted and later recreated. I don't see anything else than <domain:roid> in domain info response that would allow EPP clients detection of such situations. cheers, Janusz Sienkiewicz Alexander Mayrhofer wrote: >Hi, > >i just noticed that the "roid" element in the response to a <domain:info> >request is a mandatory element. However, it seems that the "roid" is not >required in any other requests on domain objects, because all other >transactions use the <domain:name> to identify a certain object instance. > >So, is there a reason why the "roid" is not optional in the <info> response? >And, any chance to change that in 3731bis? As it seems to me, we'd need to >"leak" the internal id of a domain object to the client for just this single >info-response - without any further use. > >any insight appreciated. > >cheers > >Alex Mayrhofer >nic.at > >