[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 14:46:20 +0200
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20051019151640.A168448@snoopy.cc.univie.ac.at>
Sender: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Subject: [ietf-provreg] Re: EPP domain:transfer

On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 03:16:40PM +0200,
 Gerhard Winkler <gerhard.winkler@univie.ac.at> wrote 
 a message of 130 lines which said:

> Are there any ideas how this transfer problem could be solved still
> using the EPP RFCs?

What's the purpose of this? Intellectual exercice? Standards are
supposed to make life *simpler*. If you need a lot of work to fit your
business rules into the standard, then it is not worth it.

EPP is a bad standard because it is not possible, giving the variety
of registration rules, to have a standard which is both standard
(meaning reuse of software) and sufficient.



Home | Date list | Subject list