To:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
cc:
"'Bernie Hoeneisen'" <bhoeneis@switch.ch>, "'enum@ietf.org'" <enum@ietf.org>, "'ietf-provreg@cafax.se'" <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>, brunner@nic-naa.net
From:
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>
Date:
Fri, 24 Sep 2004 15:26:41 +0000
In-Reply-To:
Your message of "Fri, 24 Sep 2004 14:27:09 -0400." <5BEA6CDB196A4241B8BE129D309AA4AF040D84E6@vsvapostal8.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: [ietf-provreg] New I/D: draft-hoeneisen-enum-validation-epp-0 0
> <annoyance> > It's customary to include an acknowledgements section, especially when much > of the text is clearly copied from earlier work done by someone else. > </annoyance> I know how you feel. Leslie just got a variation on my ":43 considered obsolete" to RFC, without a single ack.