To:
"'Bernie Hoeneisen'" <bhoeneis@switch.ch>, "'enum@ietf.org'" <enum@ietf.org>
Cc:
"'ietf-provreg@cafax.se'" <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Date:
Fri, 24 Sep 2004 14:27:09 -0400
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
RE: [ietf-provreg] New I/D: draft-hoeneisen-enum-validation-epp-00
> I am looking forward to your comments and proposals for improvement. <annoyance> It's customary to include an acknowledgements section, especially when much of the text is clearly copied from earlier work done by someone else. </annoyance> I'll review this in more detail when I have more time, but I'm not sure I understand how this can work without also using the ENUM extension [1] I've been working on. Wouldn't an <info> response, for example, also need to return the <info> data described in my draft once the domain exists in the registry? At first glance I think there needs to be some text in your document explaining the relationship to my document. -Scott- [1] http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-enum-epp-e164-05.txt