From: Edward Lewis <email@example.com>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 10:19:35 -0400
Subject: [ietf-provreg] last day for last call comments
A reminder... >Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 15:30:29 +0200 >To: firstname.lastname@example.org >From: Edward Lewis <email@example.com> >Subject: [ietf-provreg] WG last call for Guidelines for Extending ...EPP >Cc: Edward Lewis <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com > >Let this message start a WG last call for comments on the >"Guidelines for Extending EPP" document. The URL for the current >document is: > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-provreg-epp-ext-02.txt > >This document is intended to be forwarded to the IESG as an Informational RFC. > >The last call will end on May 27 , with the desire to forward the >document onward by May 30. So far we haven't seen much discussion >on this document, so I don't anticipate that there will be a high >volume of comments. > >So - why advance this document and not drop it? > >This document was prompted by a number of efforts to extend EPP >outside of the WG purview. In many cases, these folks made contact >with Scott for tips and hints when it was apparent that the >extension was going awry. This document was asked for by the WG to >give others a general path toward extending EPP and to also free up >Scott to pursue other things - like his normally assigned work. ;) > >So, although this document isn't about interoperability per se, it >is important to the group to capture this knowledge before declaring >that we have defined a proposed standard version of EPP. > > If you want to choose a specific minute - May 28, 1200 UTC. But >remember, it's never too late to comment... -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Edward Lewis +1-703-227-9854 ARIN Research Engineer Your office is *not* a reality-based sit-com TV show.