To:
Edward Lewis <edlewis@arin.net>
cc:
<iesg-secretary@ietf.org>, <hardie@qualcomm.com>, <jaap@sidn.nl>, <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
Rick Wesson <wessorh@ar.com>
Date:
Mon, 28 Apr 2003 13:30:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:
<a05111b02bad2d71131b5@[192.136.136.76]>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: [ietf-provreg] provreg wg responses to IESG comments
wow, its amazing that this process works sometimes, ant to all those that have worked on the documents, and especially scott, a hearty thank you. i do still have one issue with the language "for marketing purposes" I know of no AUP under any TLD that allows a contact to be used for ANY marketing purpose, and as suck I request this language be changed to <contact/>: Contact information not restricted by contact, though other AUP may apply. also specificly strike "for the promotion of a product or service." no registry has ever allowed this and most specificly prevent such, this doesn't be long in an RFC. I know all the above was unintentional and i'm sure once you think about it you'll agree too. best, -rick On Mon, 28 Apr 2003, Edward Lewis wrote: > > 2. Within the optional dcp (data collection policy) element: there is a > non-technical spin in at least the following label definition, what kind of > marketing is meant? > > <contact/>: Contact for marketing purposes. > > Please add more to this definition so that is more neutral in in its > terminology. > > RESOLUTION: The description of this element has been changed as follows: > > "<contact/>: Contact for marketing purposes. Information can be used to > contact individuals, through a communications channel other than the > protocol, for the promotion of a product or service.". >