To:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
cc:
"'Edward Lewis'" <edlewis@arin.net>, <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
Rick Wesson <wessorh@ar.com>
Date:
Fri, 18 Apr 2003 11:56:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:
<5BEA6CDB196A4241B8BE129D309AA4AF10E6CF@vsvapostal8>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: [ietf-provreg] Boolean vs. Enumerated
the reason for non-disclosure is not in the IESG requirements as discussed in SF and I do not believe we need to acknolege why its ns not disclosed in the protocol. -rick On Fri, 18 Apr 2003, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: > > So, from the chair's view, it seems like we have a proposal that is > > generally accepted plus a modification to placate the outstanding > > issue. > > If that's the case, can we focus on discussing the issue of a boolean flag > vs. a set of enumerated values and the set of values that Andy listed? > > I'm not sure I understand the practical difference between "do not disclose" > and "do not disclose because this is personal data". Why does the "because > this is personal data" matter to the server operator once I have the "do not > disclose" part? If there is no difference we're back to two values that are > essentially boolean. > > -Scott- >