To:
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>
Cc:
Edward Lewis <edlewis@arin.net>, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>, Ted Hardie <hardie@qualcomm.com>, ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From:
Edward Lewis <edlewis@arin.net>
Date:
Fri, 18 Apr 2003 10:29:33 -0400
In-Reply-To:
<200304181410.h3IEANZj011212@nic-naa.net>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: [ietf-provreg] legal entity vs individual person
At 10:10 -0400 4/18/03, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine wrote: >> As far as your input, it seems that in one message you did not want >> to make a distinction between personal and corporate. > >If it isn't too difficult, in which message? http://www.cafax.se/ietf-provreg/maillist/2003-04/msg00069.html >Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 08:25:38 -0400 >Sounds extentional. I can see some operators putting "business privacy" on >the same level as "human privacy", and some not. That one. When you said that, my interpretation was that you see this as a policy issue, not a protocol issue, hence EPP ought not distinguish. Using the word "extentional" (which Merriam-Webster has no definition for) I assumed that you were urging that the distinction be shoved into a policy specific extension, reinforcing the notion that the protocol not make the distinction. Based on my read of this, I saw that all contributors felt that the protocol not distinguish. With no other comments on the text at hand, it certainly looked like consensus was reached. -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Edward Lewis +1-703-227-9854 ARIN Research Engineer "I'm sorry, sir, your flight is delayed for maintenance. We are pounding out the dents from the last landing."