To:
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>
Cc:
"'ietf-provreg@cafax.se'" <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
Ted Hardie <hardie@qualcomm.com>
Date:
Wed, 16 Apr 2003 14:36:36 -0700
In-Reply-To:
<200304161914.h3GJE1Zj003356@nic-naa.net>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: [ietf-provreg] legal entity vs individual person
On Wednesday, April 16, 2003, at 12:14 PM, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine wrote: >> the same thing as there some forms of contact for which >> roles are not available. > > Please be specific. >> Assumes an infrastructure not uniformly present, and assumes that >> use of that infrastructure does not carry second order threats. > > Could you explain this please. Taking them together: there is no street address equivalent to a roll mailbox commonly available, and the "use a pobox" answer is not available everywhere as a substitute for street addresses. I'm sure that we could dig down into various examples for some time, but the main point is that how a legal entity and humans are treated for purposes of data disclosure is a matter of local policy.