RE: [ietf-provreg] References for Today's Host Object Discussion

["Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>]

> In an attempt to focus the discussion, however, I'd lean towards 
> restricting ourselves towards concentrating on the NS & glue case and 
> not on the MX case.  (MX might not be the only one that could be 
> added.)  It's not that I want to suffocate new ideas in the WG, but 
> it is better to meet the original goal first before expanding the 
> mission.

I concur.  We already have a mechanism for general resource record
provisioning.  Adding another increases the risk of interoperability
incompatibility.

-Scott-