To:
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>
Cc:
"'ietf-provreg@cafax.se'" <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
Vittorio Bertola <vb@bertola.eu.org>
Date:
Thu, 06 Mar 2003 10:06:02 +0100
In-Reply-To:
<200303031547.h23FlqtY079531@nic-naa.net>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: [ietf-provreg] FYI: EPP implementation by the Polish registry
On Mon, 03 Mar 2003 10:47:52 -0500, you wrote: >> The third is a message describing the EU perspective on why this must >> be solved. > >Oh thank heavens! A live EU national who is a self-described "newbie" and >neither an implementor, nor an operator, nor an author, nor apparently a >specification reader. Now I can stop thinking. Just for the sake of precision... I am an ICT engineer, I've been reading and using RFCs for the last 8 years, and I am sufficiently geek to often use e-mail by telnet 25/110 :-) I do not work in the domain name business and I am a newbie in this working group, and this is why I don't want to make suggestions about the technicalities, given that you all here have been discussing them for years. So I'm just lurking the list as often as I can. But the CRISP group has found my suggestions useful enough to include them in the latest CRISP requirements draft. >Note Bene Chair: > 1. IESG (Randy or Allison) asked and answered > 2. IESG (Patrick) asked and answered > 3. .NL asked and not responsive > 4. .PL asked and not responsive > 5. Newbie noises My intention was not to produce "noise" but just to help the group understanding the issues at stake from a different perspective. Please pardon me if I failed in this. (However this thread is going off topic, so please consider replying in private.) -- vb. [Vittorio Bertola - vb [at] bertola.eu.org]<--- -------------------> http://bertola.eu.org/ <-----------------------