To:
Edward Lewis <edlewis@arin.net>
cc:
"'ietf-provreg@cafax.se'" <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>, <iesg@ietf.org>
From:
Rick Wesson <wessorh@ar.com>
Date:
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 14:52:29 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To:
<a05111b03ba8570d19d77@[192.149.252.108]>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
RE: [ietf-provreg] FYI: EPP implementation by the Polish registry
Ed, The private discussion the wg chairs have had with the IESG have prevented this group from moving forward; therefore I request all communication between the IESG and the wg chairs also CC the list. We have experenced 4 month delay because of this situation and it is unacceptable. We still are in a state of limbo. ed, please restate the issues, proposed solutions, wg consensus (if any appears evident) and iesg issues in a single concise e-mail to this wg so we can at the very least understand where we are in this process, and how we can move it forward. thanks, -rick On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Edward Lewis wrote: > I don't know that there's a proper response to this request. > Generally, I answer privately to private mail, publicly to public > mail. If anyone contacts me privately, I don't differentiate based > on IESG membership status. > > I use my judgement when it comes to deciding whether a conversation > is better served on the public list. The below referenced discussion > didn't yield ( or hasn't yet yielded) anything that would add to the > WG. > > At 9:45 -0800 2/18/03, Rick Wesson wrote: > >Ed, > > > > > >from this point further I request all corrispondance with the IESG be > >cc'ed to this list. This issue has dragged on in part because of > >gatekeeping by the chairs. > > > >If the IESG wants to stir the pot they need to include us in the > >converstaion. > > > >I hope this is the last time I will request this as standard opperating > >procedure. > > > >best, > > > >-rick > > > > > >> Funny you should mention the latter. Here are some snippets of a > >> mail exchange I had with a member of the IESG: > >> > >> >"Section 8.4 of RFC 3375. See the MUST part of [1]" > >> > >> Paraphrasing the context of that: the IESG feels that the EPP spec > >> does not meet this requirement. > >> > >> I replied: > > -- > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > Edward Lewis +1-703-227-9854 > ARIN Research Engineer >