RE: [ietf-provreg] FYI: EPP implementation by the Polish registry

[Edward Lewis <edlewis@arin.net>]

I don't know that there's a proper response to this request. 
Generally, I answer privately to private mail, publicly to public 
mail.  If anyone contacts me privately, I don't differentiate based 
on IESG membership status.

I use my judgement when it comes to deciding whether a conversation 
is better served on the public list.  The below referenced discussion 
didn't yield ( or hasn't yet yielded) anything that would add to the 
WG.

At 9:45 -0800 2/18/03, Rick Wesson wrote:
>Ed,
>
>
>from this point further I request all corrispondance with the IESG be
>cc'ed to this list. This issue has dragged on in part because of
>gatekeeping by the chairs.
>
>If the IESG wants to stir the pot they need to include us in the
>converstaion.
>
>I hope this is the last time I will request this as standard opperating
>procedure.
>
>best,
>
>-rick
>
>
>>  Funny you should mention the latter.  Here are some snippets of a
>>  mail exchange I had with a member of the IESG:
>>
>>  >"Section 8.4 of RFC 3375. See the MUST part of [1]"
>>
>>  Paraphrasing the context of that: the IESG feels that the EPP spec
>>  does not meet this requirement.
>>
>>  I replied:

-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Edward Lewis                                          +1-703-227-9854
ARIN Research Engineer