To:
Edward Lewis <edlewis@arin.net>
cc:
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>, ietf-provreg@cafax.se, jaap@sidn.nl, brunner@nic-naa.net
From:
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>
Date:
Fri, 17 Jan 2003 17:21:42 -0500
In-Reply-To:
Your message of "Thu, 09 Jan 2003 10:55:37 EST." <a05111b06ba434aafbd3c@[192.149.252.226]>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
[ietf-provreg] Re: document management
> Some background reading: > > http://www.cafax.se/ietf-provreg/maillist/2002-12/msg00099.html I see Jaap's note 2) "Other transports". Noting the lack of interest I'll modify the conditional boilerplate in draft-brunner-epp-smtp-00.txt that anticipated adoption of the memo by a working group, track dependencies in the set of WG memos, and continue off-list. > http://www.cafax.se/ietf-provreg/maillist/2002-12/msg00092.html No comment required. > In the last, item #5 lists the three issues of which I'm aware. 2. Come to a final understanding of UDP and EPP. I'm still not convinced by PAF, or Scott Bradner, but its the opinion of the other implementors, if any, that is controlling. 3. Clarify the adoption of P3P concepts. I seem to have missed both the problem statement and the solution. 5. An SMTP mapping is all but dead in the water. See above. Eric