To:
"'Edward Lewis'" <edlewis@arin.net>, ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Date:
Wed, 8 Jan 2003 07:17:41 -0500
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
RE: privacy
> The crux of the issue is, there are situations in which a registrar > may wish to alter the default privacy considerations for data when > interacting with a registry. Not all registrar-registry environments > will need this flexibility, but there is a claim that some exist. (I > have no personal, first-hand knowledge of any such environments.) > > How can we accomodate such environments? That is the basic question. FWIW the attribute-based proposal is the one most closely aligned with "standard" XML practice, if such a thing exists. XML attributes are typically used to describe the data contained within an element, and that's what's being proposed. The other proposal I floated (the <doNotDisclose> proposal) could also work, but it means carrying the same element data twice: once in the "normal" place and a second time to mark it. I can understand why some of the folks who've been doing implementations might find it easier to incorporate into current code, but I don't think it's the best architectural solution. Just my two cents... -Scott-