RE: Updated (and hopefully the last) EPP Privacy Proposal

["Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>]

> Assuming stateful nature of EPP protocol and planned  changes 
> to the protocol
> spec [ds] that are going to make <dcp> element mandatory the 
> first option
> brings almost as much clarity as the second one. At the same 
> time the first
> option allows simpler XML syntax for default disclosure policy.
> 
> [ds]
> http://www.cafax.se/ietf-provreg/maillist/2002-12/msg00089.html

Janusz,

I never said that making the <dcp> element mandatory was something that was
going to be done -- it was only suggested as part of another proposed
solution.  Plus, the whole "separate structure" option has been discussed
with the IESG and they're not happy with it.

-Scott-