To:
"'ietf-provreg@cafax.se'" <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Date:
Fri, 13 Dec 2002 08:54:11 -0500
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Document Status
Here's where I am in terms of editing the WG documents to address IESG and recent WG comments: - All of the IESG comments have been addressed except those that relate to privacy. More on that below. - I'm going with Ed's assessment [1] that we do not have consensus to include Rick's "lastVerified" suggestion as an optional element. - I've heard no objections to Janusz' suggested replacement text [2] for the description of external host processing, so I plan to incorporate his text changes. Now for the privacy stuff: I've seen no support for the IESG suggestion to tag individual elements with a "private" attribute, so we need to come up with a counter proposal to take back to them. I see two choices: 1) We again describe how we can define privacy policies via the extension mechanism. I already tried this once and the idea wasn't well received. Or, 2) We make the <dcp> element mandatory and add an element (with dcp-like child elements) to the command structure that allows the client to opt-out of the data collection policy elements announced by the server. I haven't tried to float this by the IESG so I'd like to know how the WG feels about the idea. Thoughts, please. -Scott- [1] http://www.cafax.se/ietf-provreg/maillist/2002-12/msg00049.html [2] http://www.cafax.se/ietf-provreg/maillist/2002-11/msg00065.html