To:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
CC:
ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From:
Klaus Malorny <Klaus.Malorny@knipp.de>
Date:
Fri, 06 Dec 2002 22:31:30 +0100
In-Reply-To:
<3CD14E451751BD42BA48AAA50B07BAD603370389@vsvapostal3.prod.netsol.com>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
User-Agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.3a) Gecko/20021126
Subject:
Re: lastVerified: optional vs. extension
Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: > Hi Scott, > Yes, thanks to you I have an understanding of what .de is doing and how it > works. You're quite incorrect, though, to claim that I or anyone else > ignored the .de model or your points. I (and several others) _disagreed_ > with your points. That doesn't mean your position was ignored, and it's an > assault on reality to claim otherwise. > No, no. I have don't have any problems if there are multiple positions regarding a topic with good arguments for each one and not mine is taken at the end. But regarding the discussion I'm referring to, it was like convincing the pope that the earth is a sphere and not the center of the universe. You insisted on your position without taking my arguments into account. At least this appeared that way to me. > Don't forget that my last proposal for addressing out-of-zone hosts (which > tilted towards the .de model, by the way) has also not been incorporated > into the documents. That example, and the reality of how your comments were > addressed, is a measure of how the consensus process works. I'm not about > to suggest that my inputs on the issue were ignored just because the WG > didn't go along with them, though. > Well, at the moment I don't know which proposal you are referring to, but let me say that external hosts were never a problem to me. The problem I had and still have are the in-zone hosts - who is allowed to create them and under which conditions they are used for the creation of glue records. I explained more than once to you that your model does not have the high level of security/reliability you claim. I got the impression that it wasn't a communication problem that you did not understand me, but that you just *didn't want* to understand me. I have to admit that this really hurt me somewhere. > -Scott- > regards, Klaus ___________________________________________________________________________ | | | knipp | Knipp Medien und Kommunikation GmbH ------- Technologiepark Martin-Schmeißer-Weg 9 Dipl. Inf. Klaus Malorny 44227 Dortmund Klaus.Malorny@knipp.de Tel. +49 231 9703 0