To:
"Rick Wesson" <wessorh@ar.com>, "Richard Shockey" <rshockey@ix.netcom.com>
Cc:
"Edward Lewis" <edlewis@arin.net>, <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>, <jaap@sidn.nl>
From:
"Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@tucows.com>
Date:
Thu, 5 Dec 2002 01:08:36 -0500
Reply-To:
"Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@tucows.com>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: action items from our meeting in atlanta
> I propose we use our extention mechs thats what its there for,
> addressing unknown requirements....
>
That make complete sense to poor bus'nocrats like me, methinks.
Completely agree with this one (he says quietly whilst trying not to draw
attention to the fact that he hasn't posted for eight months)
-rwr
Got Blog? http://www.byte.org/blog
"People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of
thought which they seldom use."
- Soren Kierkegaard
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rick Wesson" <wessorh@ar.com>
To: "Richard Shockey" <rshockey@ix.netcom.com>
Cc: "Edward Lewis" <edlewis@arin.net>; <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>;
<jaap@sidn.nl>
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 8:24 PM
Subject: Re: action items from our meeting in atlanta
>
> Rich,
>
> On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Richard Shockey wrote:
> >
> > again I'd love to do it really .. I'm open minded, ..but how to do it is
a
> > general architectural issue that IAB/IESG should provide guidance on.
IMHO
> > this is a much larger issue the IETF will have to confront sooner rather
> > than later.
>
> I propose we use our extention mechs thats what its there for,
> addressing unknown requirements....
>
> I'm wokring on a P3Pish example, if folks think that would help explain
> this position.
>
> -rick
>
>