To:
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>
Cc:
Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>, "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>, "'ietf-provreg@cafax.se'" <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
Date:
Wed, 23 Oct 2002 14:35:11 +0200
Content-Disposition:
inline
In-Reply-To:
<200210221455.g9MEtmtE010531@nic-naa.net>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
User-Agent:
Mutt/1.3.28i
Subject:
Re: "private" Element Attribute
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 10:55:48AM -0400, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net> wrote a message of 51 lines which said: > In October 2000 the P3P Spec WG decided to split the APPEL draft out from > the P3P Spec. ... > Its a data collection practice announcement format specification, intended > for data collection implementors and policy evaluation implementors. It is > not a user preference announcement language, P3P, yes. Not APPEL. > In all the discussion I've had with data collectors and policy evaluation > engine implementors in 2000, 2001, and 2002 I can't recall anyone making > the case that a use-case for APPEL was communicating between the data > source and the data sink. It was discussed on the W3C P3P-policy mailing lists. See the archives at <URL:http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-p3p-policy/> for instance the thread "Policy for an Internet registry".