To:
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>
Cc:
Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>, "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>, "'ietf-provreg@cafax.se'" <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
Date:
Tue, 22 Oct 2002 15:55:16 +0200
Content-Disposition:
inline
In-Reply-To:
<200210221350.g9MDovtE010237@nic-naa.net>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
User-Agent:
Mutt/1.3.28i
Subject:
Re: "private" Element Attribute
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 09:50:57AM -0400, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net> wrote a message of 68 lines which said: > Unless the APPEL draft has changed significantly (and I'll check, I've > got some P3P Spec WG due diligence to do anyway), APPEL remains a > mechanism for user agents like IE6 or Mozilla to attempt to acquire a > P3P policy from some P3P policy author. Not at all and it never was. It is a mechanism to export privacy preferences from the user to the database maintainer, exactly the thing we want with the <private> element.