To:
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>
Cc:
"Edmon Chung" <edmon@neteka.com>, ietf-provreg@cafax.se, brunner@nic-naa.net
From:
Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Date:
Sat, 07 Sep 2002 09:43:19 -0700
In-Reply-To:
<200209071304.g87D4dnn052971@nic-naa.net>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: epp via smtp
At 09:04 AM 9/7/2002 -0400, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine wrote: >Edmon, > >Would it be accurate to say that yours is not an independent SMTP transport? Eric, I do not understand your question. Perhaps the easiest way to resolve my failure is for you to define what an "independent SMTP transport" for EPP would be, and how it differs from what you are calling a "bridge". >What it really does is convert SMTP sessions (optionally containing EPP >messages) to/from (optionally) EPP messages? convert SMTP sessions??? d/ ---------- Dave Crocker <mailto:dave@tribalwise.com> TribalWise, Inc. <http://www.tribalwise.com> tel +1.408.246.8253; fax +1.408.850.1850