To:
"'janusz sienkiewicz'" <janusz@libertyrms.com>
Cc:
Daniel Manley <dmanley@tucows.com>, ietf-provreg@cafax.se, "Liu, Hong" <Hong.Liu@neustar.biz>
From:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Date:
Thu, 25 Jul 2002 14:24:02 -0400
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
RE: Proposed Document Changes - Pending Operations
> The usage of <value> element could be extended. According to > the epp06 spec > the element is used only if there is an error condition. It > could be also used > in case of success condition for passing additional > information. This approach > would allow more flexibility in the future. The "flexibility" you describe is bad for interoperability. We already have an extension mechanism to support return of additional information, and the <value> element isn't part of it. -Scott-