To:
"'janusz sienkiewicz'" <janusz@libertyrms.com>, Daniel Manley <dmanley@tucows.com>
Cc:
ietf-provreg@cafax.se, "Liu, Hong" <Hong.Liu@neustar.biz>
From:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Date:
Thu, 25 Jul 2002 13:42:49 -0400
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
RE: Proposed Document Changes - Pending Operations
> I don't think any particular changes are required tp epp > protocol to acomplish > Hong's objective. In epp06 <result> element has child > <value> element. The > definition of <value> element in epp06 is more flexible than > in epp02 (it allows > xml extensions). I think <value> element could be used to > indicate that the last > operation is pending. Not really -- the purpose of allowing XML in the <value> element is so that the server can identify and return any XML that might have caused an error condition -- it's not there for extension purposes. From section 2.5 of epp-06: "- Zero or more OPTIONAL <value> elements that echo client-provided elements (including XML tag and value) that caused server error conditions." -Scott-