[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>, "'Liu, Hong'" <Hong.Liu@neustar.biz>, <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From: "Ram Mohan" <rmohan@afilias.info>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 12:40:15 -0400
Sender: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject: Re: EPP PUSH: Session Property Re-negotiation

scott,
i agree- i don't see a compelling reason to change basic session negotiation
features and requirements.

-ram
----- Original Message -----
From: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
To: "'Liu, Hong'" <Hong.Liu@neustar.biz>; <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 9:07 AM
Subject: RE: EPP PUSH: Session Property Re-negotiation


> > I would like to know how people on the list feel about it: is
> > it desirable
> > to allow session property re-negotiation after the session is set up?
>
> I think it best to deal with renegotiation only by ending a session and
> starting a new one.  It keeps things simpler and consistent with other
> session negotiation features.
>
> -Scott-
>


Home | Date list | Subject list