To:
"'ietf-provreg@cafax.se'" <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
"Liu, Hong" <Hong.Liu@neustar.biz>
Date:
Fri, 28 Jun 2002 16:54:48 -0500
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
TCP Mapping
Scott, I would like to know whether it is still possible to make changes to the TCP mapping document at this point. We have been working on a draft for EPP TCP PUSH extension, as we promised before. Sorry, we missed the -00 deadline this time... There are a number of ways to do it, but we find it the simplest to use the Total Length header of the EPP datagram in the TCP mapping to differentiate the server-pushed message from other messages. We are considering using only the highest bit in the header, but maybe a better way is to reserve the highest octet for other extensions. EPP messages do not need 2^32-1 octects, 2^24-1 should be sufficiently large. What do you think? We would also like to hear from you and others on the list about other alternatives. Thanks! --Hong