RE: Ambiguity: <value> and <data> tags belong inside <result> or <response>?

["Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>]

Robert,

I think the text you're referring to is actually on page 12 (my copy of -06
has a sample <greeting> and the start of the command description section on
page 9), but FWIW the indentation does indeed need to be fixed.  The schema
is controlling, and it clearly states that the <value> and <data> elements
are child elements of the <result> element, not the <response> element.

During the document last call someone suggested numbering the element
description paragraphs so that child relationships would be more clear, and
not potentially screwed up by indentation problems.  Assuming that the IESG
is OK with that idea I'll be adding numbers into the next version of the
documents.  If not, the indentation will be fixed.

-Scott-

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Burbidge [mailto:robert.burbidge@poptel.coop]
> Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 7:46 AM
> To: 'ietf-provreg@cafax.se'
> Subject: Ambiguity: <value> and <data> tags belong inside <result> or
> <res ponse>?
> 
> 
> Since this is my first posting to this list, I hope that (a) 
> it gets there
> and (b) it makes sense. Here goes...
> 
> Page 9 of draft-ietf-provreg-epp-06.txt, implies that the 
> <value> elements
> are contained within <response>. I say "implied" because the 
> only indication
> of containment at that point is the left paragraph indent. 
> However, the
> example on page 15 shows that value is contained inside 
> <result>. A quick
> cross-reference to the schema entry on page 60 shows that <value> is
> supposed to be in <result>, which implies that page 9 is in 
> error in this
> respect. 
> 
> I think the same comment applies for the <data> tag, judging 
> by the schema.
> 
> Would anyone like to comment on this?
> 
> Rob Burbidge
>