Re: Revised PROVREG WG minutes - 53rd IETF

["Edmon Chung" <edmon@neteka.com>]

Hi,
O... I got momentarily mixed up with implementation of the API with the epp
protocol commands.  My bad. ;-p
Edmon


----- Original Message -----
From: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
To: "'Edmon Chung'" <edmon@neteka.com>; <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 11:12 AM
Subject: RE: Revised PROVREG WG minutes - 53rd IETF


> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Edmon Chung [mailto:edmon@neteka.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 10:52 AM
> > To: Scott Rose; ietf-provreg@cafax.se
> > Subject: Re: Revised PROVREG WG minutes - 53rd IETF
> >
> >
> > Hi Scott,
> > Sorry I didnt respond to the minutes earlier.
> > At the Minneapolis meeting, I did talk about the SG implmentation.
> > Neteka is finalizing the EPP implementation at .sg to be
> > launched in May
> > 2002.
> > One of the issues we faced during the implementation was the
> > need to have
> > multiple statuses for a domain name.  In fact now that I
> > think more about
> > it, I believe this is probably an interesting enough topic that might
> > benefit to be added into the core documents.  The flexibility
> > for multiple
> > statuses means that additional EPP commands is needed to
> > add/delete/edit
> > statuses instead of simply updating the domain info.
> > thoughts everyone?
> > Edmon
>
> Objects like domains can already have multiple status values (several are
> already defined) at the same time, though some values are mutually
> exclusive.  I don't understand the problem as you've described it so
please
> provide more detail.
>
> -Scott-
>