[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: "'Edmon Chung'" <edmon@neteka.com>, ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 11:12:32 -0500
Sender: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject: RE: Revised PROVREG WG minutes - 53rd IETF

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Edmon Chung [mailto:edmon@neteka.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 10:52 AM
> To: Scott Rose; ietf-provreg@cafax.se
> Subject: Re: Revised PROVREG WG minutes - 53rd IETF
> 
> 
> Hi Scott,
> Sorry I didnt respond to the minutes earlier.
> At the Minneapolis meeting, I did talk about the SG implmentation.
> Neteka is finalizing the EPP implementation at .sg to be 
> launched in May
> 2002.
> One of the issues we faced during the implementation was the 
> need to have
> multiple statuses for a domain name.  In fact now that I 
> think more about
> it, I believe this is probably an interesting enough topic that might
> benefit to be added into the core documents.  The flexibility 
> for multiple
> statuses means that additional EPP commands is needed to 
> add/delete/edit
> statuses instead of simply updating the domain info.
> thoughts everyone?
> Edmon

Objects like domains can already have multiple status values (several are
already defined) at the same time, though some values are mutually
exclusive.  I don't understand the problem as you've described it so please
provide more detail.

-Scott-

Home | Date list | Subject list