To:
"'Daniel Manley'" <dmanley@tucows.com>, "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Cc:
ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From:
"Gould, James" <JGould@verisign.com>
Date:
Thu, 7 Mar 2002 15:08:39 -0500
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
RE: Some More Off-List Comments
I would prefer a less complex alternative of having a freeform "reason" per error result and not per error value. Since an error response can contain multiple error results, and each error result can reference multiple error element tag/values, it would be simpler to have the "reason" an element of the error result. Multiple error results can be used to satisfy the error reporting requirements. Jim > ---------- > From: Hollenbeck, Scott > Sent: Thursday, March 7, 2002 2:36 PM > To: 'Daniel Manley' > Cc: ietf-provreg@cafax.se > Subject: RE: Some More Off-List Comments > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Daniel Manley [mailto:dmanley@tucows.com] > > Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 2:38 PM > > To: Hollenbeck, Scott > > Cc: 'lynettek@netnumber.com'; ietf-provreg@cafax.se > > Subject: Re: Some More Off-List Comments > > > > > > Shouldn't the "reason" tie in with the array of <values>? > > Because each > > field could have a different reason. > > Sure, I suppose it could. > > -Scott- > >