To:
ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From:
budi@alliance.globalnetlink.com
Date:
Thu, 28 Feb 2002 07:04:02 +0700
Content-description:
Mail message body
In-reply-to:
<200202272048.g1RKmH123922@nic-naa.net>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: Mapping IP Addresses to Geographic Location
On 27 Feb 2002 at 15:48, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine wrote: > host-by-addr (an instance of object-by-attribute) raises two issues: > > o existance and relevenacy of object-by-attribute mechanism, a > general question of specification scope, and data specification, > and > o reverse lookup, mapping ip addresses to geographic location, a > specific question of relevance where locality of reference is > not casual. Not sure whether that's going to be popular. I don't put exact geographical location (or info about OS of our names servers) in our DNS record. For security/privacy reasons. I suspect others would do the same. But there are times (actually numerous) that I want to find the geographical location of an intruder (for example). Frequently I use <http://visualroute.visualware.com> to find out where the attacker/intruder came from. Of course, it doesn't give the *exact* geographical location. But close enough. And still preserves privacy. (I think.) my 2 cents. -- budi