To:
"Damaraju, Ayesha" <ayesha.damaraju@neustar.biz>
cc:
"'Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine'" <brunner@nic-naa.net>, "Liu, Hong" <Hong.Liu@neustar.biz>, Edward Lewis <lewis@tislabs.com>, ietf-provreg@cafax.se, brunner@nic-naa.net
From:
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>
Date:
Tue, 19 Feb 2002 18:10:24 -0800
In-Reply-To:
Message from "Damaraju, Ayesha" <ayesha.damaraju@neustar.biz> of "Tue, 19 Feb 2002 16:36:36 CST." <70565611B164D511957A001083FCDD561FB073@VA02>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: Call for agenda items for Minneapolis
> ... not a good idea to use name value pairs in a string - with no schema > definition it kills the purpose of XML & XML validators Yup. The document (whether a registry operational document, or an I-D) could have referenced or modified existing schema, or proposed something useful. A name value pair is simply ... pre-XML. Fine for RRP-esque things (no offense intended to the RRP-esque afficianados), but infra-dig for EPP. Eric