To:
<Jeff.Neuman@neustar.us>
Cc:
<ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
"Jim Fleming" <jfleming@anet.com>
Date:
Fri, 18 Jan 2002 14:32:59 -0800
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga-full/Arc09/msg00731.html
http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga-full/Arc09/msg00731.html a.. Subject: [ga] RE: [GTLD Registries List] FW: .BIZ Transfer Policy a.. From: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@neustar.us> "We believe the mess in .com, .net and .org has taken way too long to resolve and often the consumer is being left out of the debate." ... "Before this can happen, however, registrars and registrants must be educated on how to generate a token, how to maintain the security of a token, and how to recover a lost token, through the EPP Protocol used by the "thick registries." This takes time." ----- What is the "mess in .COM" ?? .COM is one of the "Best of Breed" TLDs that has made it past the Proof-of-Concept phase. .BIZ and .US seem to be taking a long time and are viewed by many to be a "mess". 2002 0:201 .COM 2002 1:158 .CLUB 2002 2:143 .FAMILY 2002 3:219 .INFO 2002 4:58 .LLC 2002 5:194 .INC 2002 6:171 .TV 2002 7:195 .CHURCH How will EPP and all of this education about "tokens" help .COM ? Will that be used for the new 2002 .COM servers ?...to support mapping people's existing .COM nameservers into larger address spaces. Jim Fleming 2002:[IPv4]:000X:03DB http://www.IPv8.info