To:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
cc:
<ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
Rick H Wesson <wessorh@ar.com>
Date:
Thu, 17 Jan 2002 17:25:32 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To:
<3CD14E451751BD42BA48AAA50B07BAD60189B586@vsvapostal3.bkup6>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
RE: <info> Command and authInfo
Scott, yes, I read those -- I was asking for the text in the draft, to compare. From what I understand the <info> command currently returns a subset of the object depending or not if you are the sponsoring registrar. Is this not waht passed last call? -rick On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Rick H Wesson [mailto:wessorh@ar.com] > > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:00 PM > > To: Hollenbeck, Scott > > Cc: 'Patrick'; ietf-provreg@cafax.se > > Subject: RE: <info> Command and authInfo > > > > [snip] > > > Would you mind restating the compromise position -- I didn't > > notice that > > we had one. I've seen some objections to the current draft in > > this are but > > I don't understand what our compromise is; nor have I agreeded that we > > have one. > > Look here: > http://www.cafax.se/ietf-provreg/maillist/2002-01/msg00031.html > > http://www.cafax.se/ietf-provreg/maillist/2002-01/msg00033.html > > -Scott- >