To:
"'Patrick'" <patrick@gandi.net>, ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Date:
Thu, 17 Jan 2002 17:15:13 -0500
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
RE: <info> Command and authInfo
> -----Original Message----- > From: Patrick [mailto:patrick@gandi.net] > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 3:50 PM > To: ietf-provreg@cafax.se > Subject: Re: <info> Command and authInfo > > > Or the command was badely designed. > (it seems to me that if a Registry using EPP right now says that the > current state is not ok to do transfers... then it is not a social > problem of someone not willing to do something...) I've already read the NeuLevel document, too, and I have to agree with Ross' assessment. What was written wasn't an indictment of the protocol at all, but a description of a need for social education for a feature that hasn't been available before -- and that's probably a much more difficult task than this WG's task. -Scott-