[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: <asbjorn.rrp@theglobalname.org>
Cc: <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From: "Jim Fleming" <jfleming@anet.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 13:32:58 -0800
Sender: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject: Re: <info> Command and authInfo

The year is 2002...
The notion of a "gTLD" appears to be some out-dated concept
from the "toy", legacy, IPv4 Internet.

Registrar and Registry are artificial creations of multi-level-marketing
structures. It is not clear what the IETF has to do with marketing or
markets, etc. That would seem to be more of what one would find in
the EPP Trade Association.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/epp-ta/

As for 2002 TLDs....things are shaping up...
2002 0:201 .COM
2002 1:158 .CLUB
2002 2:143 .FAMILY
2002 3:219 .INFO
2002 4:58 .LLC
2002 5:194 .INC
2002 6:171 .TV
2002 7:195 .CHURCH

Jim Fleming
2002:[IPv4]:000X:03DB
http://www.IPv8.info



----- Original Message -----
From: "Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine" <brunner@nic-naa.net>
To: <asbjorn.rrp@theglobalname.org>
Cc: <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>; <brunner@nic-naa.net>
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 1:12 PM
Subject: Re: <info> Command and authInfo


> Asbjorn,
>
> When a registrar fails, the "should" ceases to be controlling, as a "must"
> may arise. It is an edge case, but for EPP deployments outside of the gTLD
> market, the space of reasonable assumptions is larger, or less
constrained,
> than inside the gTLD market, and we have to solve for the larger problem.
>
> Eric
> wampumpeag, llc


Home | Date list | Subject list