RE: "External" hosts in EPP

[Rick H Wesson <wessorh@ar.com>]

Scott,

I'd agree that Asbjorn's proposal is reasonable one. OTOH, creating
objects for non-glue hosts seem counterintuitive, I'd prefer that we did
not have too. If others favor consistency, i'll drop my objection.

-rick


On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:

> Rick,
>
> I working from Asbjorn's proposal; full reference here [1].  The argument I
> heard earlier today is that consistency will make implementation easier by
> minimizing "special case" behavior.
>
> -Scott-
> [1]
> http://www.cafax.se/ietf-provreg/maillist/2001-11/msg00000.html
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Rick H Wesson [mailto:wessorh@ar.com]
> > Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 2:14 PM
> > To: Hollenbeck, Scott
> > Cc: ietf-provreg@cafax.se
> > Subject: RE: "External" hosts in EPP
> >
> >
> >
> > Scott,
> >
> > I'm definately for what works. could you restate the proposal
> > in clearer
> > terms. for out-of-zone hosts would every registrar still need
> > to create a
> > host object? If so how is that easier, or is it just more consistant.
> >
> > thanks
> >
> > -rick
>