To:
ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Date:
Mon, 17 Dec 2001 13:17:47 -0500
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
RE: "External" hosts in EPP
> -----Original Message----- > From: asbjorn.rrp@theglobalname.org > [mailto:asbjorn.rrp@theglobalname.org] > Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 1:56 PM > To: ietf-provreg@cafax.se > Subject: "External" hosts in EPP > [snip] > I am wondering if the following might be worth considering: > > a) For in-zone hosts, everything is as described in EPP-host-03. > > b) Out-of-zone hosts, on the other hand, are "private" to a > RegistrAR; they are registered on a RegistrAR basis and will > be invisible/un-referable for other RegistrARs. I need to bring this up again. We talked about the "out of zone" host issue at the SLC session, but now I'm not sure if the alternative I described (first sent to the list by Rick Wesson [1]) is the best way to tackle this problem. As I started to look at the needed I-D updates I did a chalk talk with some of my implementers, and they believe that Asbjorn's suggestion may be more efficient to operate and easier to implement as it keeps host-related protocol operations consistent. I didn't see any objections to Asbjorn's suggestion on the list, just Rick's alternative and related discussion. If there _are_ objections, now would be a good time to raise them. -Scott- [1] http://www.cafax.se/ietf-provreg/maillist/2001-11/msg00001.html