[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 13:17:47 -0500
Sender: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject: RE: "External" hosts in EPP

> -----Original Message-----
> From: asbjorn.rrp@theglobalname.org
> [mailto:asbjorn.rrp@theglobalname.org]
> Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 1:56 PM
> To: ietf-provreg@cafax.se
> Subject: "External" hosts in EPP
> 

[snip]

> I am wondering if the following might be worth considering:
> 
> a) For in-zone hosts, everything is as described in EPP-host-03.
> 
> b) Out-of-zone hosts, on the other hand, are "private" to a 
> RegistrAR; they are registered on a RegistrAR basis and will 
> be invisible/un-referable for other RegistrARs.

I need to bring this up again.  We talked about the "out of zone" host issue
at the SLC session, but now I'm not sure if the alternative I described
(first sent to the list by Rick Wesson [1]) is the best way to tackle this
problem.  As I started to look at the needed I-D updates I did a chalk talk
with some of my implementers, and they believe that Asbjorn's suggestion may
be more efficient to operate and easier to implement as it keeps
host-related protocol operations consistent.

I didn't see any objections to Asbjorn's suggestion on the list, just Rick's
alternative and related discussion.  If there _are_ objections, now would be
a good time to raise them.

-Scott-
[1]
http://www.cafax.se/ietf-provreg/maillist/2001-11/msg00001.html

Home | Date list | Subject list