To:
"'Rick H Wesson'" <wessorh@ar.com>, "'ietf-provreg@cafax.se'" <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Date:
Thu, 8 Nov 2001 19:56:39 -0500
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
RE: [Epp-rtk-devel] contact field lengths (fwd)
> -----Original Message----- > From: Rick H Wesson [mailto:wessorh@ar.com] > Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 4:40 PM > To: 'ietf-provreg@cafax.se' > Subject: [Epp-rtk-devel] contact field lengths (fwd) > > > > > a bit of opperational experence, alot of registrars are finding our > limitations on lengths in the contact object a bit limiting. I've recieved > several queries on this today and I expect to see more as we progress with > an -03 implementation of the contact mapping. > > I'm not sure what the diferences are between -01 and -03 in respect to > lengths but we need to consider bumping them back up. They _were_ bumped back up in contact-03: "Increased postalLineLength maximum length to 64 from 30." Considering that the notes you referred to from the epp-rtk list specifically mentioned the 30-character limits described in epp-04/contact-02 (which were there in the belief that ISO standard 11180:1993(E) might be appropriate, which we've since abandoned), the real question is if 64 is enough. -Scott-