[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: "'Rick H Wesson'" <wessorh@ar.com>, "'ietf-provreg@cafax.se'" <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 19:56:39 -0500
Sender: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject: RE: [Epp-rtk-devel] contact field lengths (fwd)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rick H Wesson [mailto:wessorh@ar.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 4:40 PM
> To: 'ietf-provreg@cafax.se'
> Subject: [Epp-rtk-devel] contact field lengths (fwd)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> a bit of opperational experence, alot of registrars are finding our
> limitations on lengths in the contact object a bit limiting. I've recieved
> several queries on this today and I expect to see more as we progress with
> an -03 implementation of the contact mapping.
> 
> I'm not sure what the diferences are between -01 and -03 in respect to
> lengths but we need to consider bumping them back up.

They _were_ bumped back up in contact-03:

"Increased postalLineLength maximum length to 64 from 30."

Considering that the notes you referred to from the epp-rtk list
specifically mentioned the 30-character limits described in
epp-04/contact-02 (which were there in the belief that ISO standard
11180:1993(E) might be appropriate, which we've since abandoned), the real
question is if 64 is enough.

-Scott-

Home | Date list | Subject list