Re: Trafficking documents

[Rick H Wesson <wessorh@ar.com>]

Ed,

what about the e164 mapping scott added a while back?

-rick

On Thu, 25 Oct 2001, Edward Lewis wrote:

> The WG has a few internet drafts under consideration:
>
> 1) The requirements
> 2) EPP base
> 3)   EPP domain mapping
> 4)   EPP host mapping
> 5)   EPP contact mapping
> 6)   EPP over TCP
> 7)   EPP over BEEP
> 8)   Containers in EPP
> 9) Definitions
>
> Doc #1 has been returned to the IESG.  I haven't heard any feedback on that
> yet.
>
> It appears to me that we want to advance (when ready) documents #2,3,4,5 as
> a unit, and docs #6,7 optionally as the same unit - or at least separately
> but at close to the same time.
>
> Document #8 isn't tied to the base specification and can travel separately.
>
> I'm not sure if we still need document #9.
>
> Any comments on this plan?
>
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Edward Lewis                                                NAI Labs
> Phone: +1 443-259-2352                      Email: lewis@tislabs.com
>
> You fly too often when ... the airport taxi is on speed-dial.
>
> Opinions expressed are property of my evil twin, not my employer.
>
>