RE: Trafficking documents

["Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Edward Lewis [mailto:lewis@tislabs.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 1:27 PM
> To: ietf-provreg@cafax.se
> Cc: lewis@tislabs.com; jaap@sidn.nl
> Subject: Trafficking documents
> 
> 
> The WG has a few internet drafts under consideration:
> 
> 1) The requirements
> 2) EPP base
> 3)   EPP domain mapping
> 4)   EPP host mapping
> 5)   EPP contact mapping
> 6)   EPP over TCP
> 7)   EPP over BEEP
> 8)   Containers in EPP
> 9) Definitions
> 
> Doc #1 has been returned to the IESG.  I haven't heard any feedback on
that
> yet.
> 
> It appears to me that we want to advance (when ready) documents #2,3,4,5
as
> a unit, and docs #6,7 optionally as the same unit - or at least separately
> but at close to the same time.

I'd rather not explicitly tie #6 and #7 given the relative maturity of the
two documents.  I suspect that #6 is closer to being "done" than #7, so it
may make sense to move #6 forward as part of the #2-#5 package so that
there's at least one transport document to complete the package.  2-5
without a transport document isn't a complete package.

There haven't been very many comments directed towards epp-BEEP; I'd like to
know if that's due to folks being happy with the draft, not having looked at
it yet, or if there's a lack of interest.  I've provided some comments based
on a cursory read, but I haven't yet had a chance to give it the more
thorough reading that's needed for me to feel as comfortable with it as I do
with epp-TCP.

-Scott-