To:
"'Dave Crocker'" <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>, Pindar Wong <pindar@hk.super.net>
Cc:
"'Paul M. Kane'" <Paul.Kane@REACTO.com>, ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Date:
Thu, 27 Sep 2001 07:02:18 -0400
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
RE: "opt-in" schema
>-----Original Message----- >From: Dave Crocker [mailto:dcrocker@brandenburg.com] >Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 1:33 AM >To: Pindar Wong >Cc: Hollenbeck, Scott; 'Paul M. Kane'; ietf-provreg@cafax.se >Subject: Re: "opt-in" schema > > >At 05:23 PM 9/26/2001, Pindar Wong wrote: >>If this group doesn't mind, I'll put together something over this long >>weekend in Hong Kong, so that we've got something that we can work through >>to identify the major issues (e.g. atomicity of what is being >>opted-in-to/out-of). > >Pindar, Paul, Scott, > >Let me suggest something a little simpler and more general: A mechanism >for exchanging "registry-specific parameters" (RSP), with epp knowing >nothing at all about the details of the parameter. Given the nature of this topic this sounds like an excellent approach. It could be doable with the current extension mechanism, which allow a registry to define whatever parameters it finds appropriate for any particular operation. <Scott/>