RE: <check> Response Attribute

["Stuart Marsden" <Stuart.Marsden@poptel.net>]

For a restricted domain (eg dot coop) you would have "no" for lack of
registrant eligibility

Stuart Marsden

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se [mailto:owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se]
On Behalf Of Hollenbeck, Scott
Sent: 23 September 2001 00:34
To: 'Patrick'; ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject: RE: <check> Response Attribute

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Patrick [mailto:patrick@gandi.net]
> Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2001 10:28 AM
> To: ietf-provreg@cafax.se
> Subject: Re: <check> Response Attribute
> 
> 
> So the information about why it can not be registered is still
> useful.

I think Dan Manley suggested this as well.  OK, if multiple people feel
it
would be helpful to provide both a yes/no response and some sort of
rationale if the answer is "no", should we attempt to enumerate the
reasons
for "no" or should we consider free-form (aka server-defined, with some
defined maximum length) text to describe the rationale?

<Scott/>