To:
"'Patrick'" <patrick@gandi.net>, ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Date:
Sat, 22 Sep 2001 19:33:49 -0400
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
RE: <check> Response Attribute
> -----Original Message----- > From: Patrick [mailto:patrick@gandi.net] > Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2001 10:28 AM > To: ietf-provreg@cafax.se > Subject: Re: <check> Response Attribute > > > So the information about why it can not be registered is still > useful. I think Dan Manley suggested this as well. OK, if multiple people feel it would be helpful to provide both a yes/no response and some sort of rationale if the answer is "no", should we attempt to enumerate the reasons for "no" or should we consider free-form (aka server-defined, with some defined maximum length) text to describe the rationale? <Scott/>