To:
Chris Cowherd <chris.cowherd@enom.com>
cc:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>, "'ietf-provreg@cafax.se'" <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>
Date:
Fri, 21 Sep 2001 11:57:25 -0400
In-Reply-To:
Your message of "Fri, 21 Sep 2001 08:52:57 PDT." <935533C14F67D411B333009027DC5F6A01478AF1@mail.enom.com>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: <check> Response Attribute
> I would say that "reserved" domain names are not available. Help me to understand. Does "reserved" mean "exits" or does "reserved" mean "doesn't exist"? Why is either of these better than "reserved"? Here are my concerns: 1. substitution of an inextensible type for an extensible type. 2. over-specification of the <check> use-case. Eric