RE: WG Discussion Summary with Draft Document Impact

["Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>]

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
>[mailto:brunner@nic-naa.net]
>Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 5:04 AM
>To: 'ietf-provreg@cafax.se'
>Cc: Hollenbeck, Scott; brunner@nic-naa.net
>Subject: Re: WG Discussion Summary with Draft Document Impact 
>
>
>
>I've sent out a summary of nits in the requirements draft, as I'd really
like
>to see it a "generic" and not "generic domain name" requirements draft, and
>there are a few minor errors. I'll work with Scott on this off-list.

As I said at the meeting yesterday, the current requirements draft is true
to the original stated need for producing the document as described by
members of the IAB and IESG that I conferred with long before provreg
existed.  Even in their most current review, the IESG did not provide any
comments suggesting more generalization.

If anyone wants a more generalized requirements draft, I suggest writing
another draft.

<Scott/>