Re: Proposed agenda

[Rick H Wesson <wessorh@ar.com>]

IMHO,

drafts should only be discussed at the meeting if there is some discussion
on the list. I've read the draft and feel that is completely out of scope
of our current work.

I hate seeing valuable discussion time taken up by drafts with only the
support of the author.

-rick

On Thu, 26 Jul 2001, Edward Lewis wrote:

> At 10:05 PM -0400 7/25/01, James Seng/Personal wrote:
> >No update was done to -00 and no intention to, since it is not relevant
> >to provreg as the co-chairs claims.
>
> For the record, the co-chairs have never made any judgement on the
> relevance of the document.  We have refused to make it a WG item in its
> current state, but would like to see it discussed at the meeting to see if
> it shows promise.
>
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Edward Lewis                                                NAI Labs
> Phone: +1 443-259-2352                      Email: lewis@tislabs.com
>
> You fly too often when ... the airport taxi is on speed-dial.
>
> Opinions expressed are property of my evil twin, not my employer.
>
>