To:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
cc:
"'ietf-provreg@cafax.se'" <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
Rick H Wesson <wessorh@ar.com>
Date:
Wed, 20 Jun 2001 06:32:53 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:
<DF737E620579D411A8E400D0B77E671D01878068@regdom-ex01.prod.netsol.com>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: Versioning
Scott, On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: > to identify version 1 of the mapping. If a new version is needed at a later > date, incrementing the version number in the URI provides an easy way to > ensure parser-enforced uniqueness. how about major-minor-patch. I forsee more object types than the ones we have now. Also how would you track the rfc ststus? -draft-01 -rfc-01 -draft-standard-01 ... If we will use this mechanism I'd like there to be some meaning behind it. -rick > Any thoughts or objections? This type of URI versioning might also be > useful in the base protocol specification, though we currently use a > <version> element there for this purpose. > > <Scott/> >