To:
"'ietf-provreg@cafax.se'" <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Date:
Mon, 11 Jun 2001 08:22:32 -0400
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
FW: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-provreg-epp-02.txt
I received the following private comments on the recent EPP drafts. Does anyone have any issues with these suggested changes? <Scott/> -----Original Message----- [headers removed] You may want to consider defining application/epp+xml in an appendix, based on the template of RFC 3023. You want to change the use of SHALL to MUST. Also, this phrase "raw Unicode character sets" should be changed to "and UTF-16". Note that based on the new specification of UTF-32, raw Unicode character sets has a basically undefined meaning. It probably is a good policy to limit exchanges to UTF-8. Finally, it would be nice to have an introductory section describing the problem space that EPP is attacking and a quick overview of its purpose. For example, see section 1.1 of RFC 2960.