To:
"'Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine'" <brunner@nic-naa.net>
Cc:
"'Damaraju, Ayesha'" <ayesha.damaraju@neustar.com>, ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Date:
Wed, 16 May 2001 18:40:21 -0400
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
RE: Epp - Contacts
> -----Original Message----- > From: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine > [mailto:brunner@nic-naa.net] > Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 6:02 PM > To: Hollenbeck, Scott > Cc: 'Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine'; 'Damaraju, Ayesha'; > ietf-provreg@cafax.se; brunner@nic-naa.net > Subject: Re: Epp - Contacts [snip] > Anyone got a case against? A case for necessity of > uniqueness? Impossiblity > (or difficulty) of ordering? Lacking that, its just a matter of taste. The only way I can define "its just a matter of taste" in XML Schema is by not defining an upper bound on the number of elements. <Scott/>